This annual Australian Project Management Conference delivers a program including the following key speakers:

 

PMOZ Program Topics

Michael Pascoe - how to not waste a good economic crisis

Bruce Ferguson - a critical thinking approach to project execution

Professor Li Shirong - sustainable city development

Rob Thomsett - how to effectively implement the Gershon Report

 

The 6th Annual Project Management Australia (PMOZ) Conference incorporating the PMI Australia National Conference and Project Manager of the Year Awards will include the above keynote speakers backed up by informative workshops and sessions and an extensive trade exhibition.

www.pmoz.com.au

 

 

Where: National Convention Centre Canberra

Date: 10-12 August, 2009

 

At the PMOZ Conference, Colin Cropley Director, Project and Risk Management Advisory

Services of Crescent  will present on the following topic:


Sustain your Organisation through Integrated Risk Management and Analysis

Project Management has come a long way since the advent of the Critical Path Method and increasing implementation of effective project management described in the PMBoK Guide. 

However, an unacceptably high proportion of projects continue to fail. 

Risk Management is a widely recognised but poorly practised necessity for improving the likelihood of successful project outcomes.  The PMBoK Guide describes Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis and Risk Response Planning, but doesn’t explain how these processes can be tied together to minimise project failure.

This presentation explores reasons why project schedules and estimates are inherently optimistic.  It then describes a practical methodology now in use for integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis and Risk Response Planning.  This approach develops realistic project schedules and estimates and thus minimises project failure due to inadequate cost and schedule contingencies.

A ranked and treated risk register is developed.

The project estimate is loaded into the project schedule.  All uncertain parameters are ranged.

Risks from the register are mapped to the appropriate project activities or resources and a Monte Carlo range analysis calculated.

The Management Reserve for both project duration and project cost are then determined.

Advantages of this approach include:

·         that it reflects the riskiness of the project as identified in the risk register;

·         that the contributions of each risk are measurable;

·         that the magnitude of the risk provision is determined by the organisation; and

·         that delay effects on project costs are realistically represented by this approach

 

The presentation may include live demonstration using the simulation software – Primavera Risk Manager TM (Pertmaster), and

RiskIntegrator2™, the enterprise risk management database application developed to identify and manage risks through the project lifecycle and map them to tasks in Pertmaster.


Learning Outcomes:

Attendees will understand -

·         Reasons why project schedules and estimates tend to be optimistic;

·         How to integrate a project estimate with a project schedule;

·         Why this integrated approach is the only realistic way to estimate the cost consequences of project delays;

·         How to integrate the Qualitative Risk Identification, Ranking and Treatment process with the Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis process to produce an auditable, risk adjusted estimate of cost and time outcomes for a project.


FireFoxFix